What makes a paper peer reviewed

For three years, five Elsevier journals experimented with publication of peer review reports signed or anonymous as articles alongside the accepted paper on ScienceDirect example. Read more about the experiment. In general transparency is the key to trust in peer review. Some journals also provide details about the number of reviewers who reviewed the article before acceptance.

Elsevier authors can transfer their article submission from one journal to another for free if they are rejected, without the need to reformat, and often without needing further peer review.

We therefore ask referees during the review process for their consent to transfer their full review report including all comments to the author and editor along with the manuscript to the receiver journal.

The benefits of full manuscript review cascades are twofold:. Results masked review: peer review without publication bias. Is open peer review the way forward? Peer review innovations aiming to support science and reward reviewers. Experimenting with collaborative peer review. Understanding the peer review process. Transparency in peer review. We are always looking for ways to improve customer experience on Elsevier. We would like to ask you for a moment of your time to fill in a short questionnaire, at the end of your visit.

If you decide to participate, a new browser tab will open so you can complete the survey after you have completed your visit to this website. Thanks in advance for your time. About Elsevier. Set via JS. Home Reviewers What is peer review? The peer review process. Not all information in a peer-reviewed journal is actually refereed, or reviewed. How do you determine whether an article qualifies as being a peer-reviewed journal article?

First, you need to be able to identify which journals are peer-reviewed. There are generally four methods for doing this. If you have used the previous four methods in trying to determine if an article is from a peer-reviewed journal and are still unsure, speak to your instructor.

In this section. Library Guides. Three categories of information resources: Newspapers and magazines containing news - Articles are written by reporters who may or may not be experts in the field of the article. Consequently, articles may contain incorrect information. The article is more likely to be scientifically valid, reach reasonable conclusions, etc. In most cases the reviewers do not know who the author of the article is, so that the article succeeds or fails on its own merit, not the reputation of the expert.

Helpful hint! There are generally four methods for doing this Limiting a database search to peer-reviewed journals only. Some databases allow you to limit searches for articles to peer reviewed journals only.

The current assumption is that open peer review can only work as a supplement to the existing peer review process rather than replacing it altogether. Open peer review also has a number of different variants. Issues that have prompted particular discussion include doubts about the extent to which people should be able to make reviews and comments anonymously, since there is obviously a risk that the process could be muddied by personal feelings and rivalries between individual scientists.

Important note: The information and links provided here do not represent any form of binding legal advice. They are solely intended to provide an initial basis to help get you on the right track. However, we are unable to accept any liability whatsoever for any errors it may contain. Jasmin Schmitz: Peer Review. London Elizabeth Wager: Ethics: What is it for? Analysing the purpose of peer review.

In: Nature, In: The Scholarly Kitchen, Juli August Kevin L. In: Library Journal, DataCite is an international not-for-profit organisation that offers services and know-how relating to the management, referencing and citation of research data. The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany AWMF supports the scientific exchange of its more than member associations from all fields of medicine.

This website uses cookies. We use cookies to give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to use the site you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more. How the peer review process works When a scholarly work is submitted to a scientific journal, it first undergoes a preliminary check known as a desk review.

Different types of peer review The term peer review actually encompasses a number of different approaches, the most common of which are the following: single-blind peer review: the name of the reviewer is hidden from the author; double-blind peer review: both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous to each other.

Criticisms of peer review All the methods mentioned above have their advantages and disadvantages. Alternatives to the standard peer review process This criticism has led to the discussion of new alternatives such as open peer review, a concept which includes crowd sourced peer review.